Government invest in the visual arts, the kind you commonly see in art galleries, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
During past few decades, governments spend money on both art visual arts as well as on projects to improve the quality of life of people. While, I agree that spending on public works for ensuring the standard of quality of life is the prime duty of governments, I do not think allocating money for visual arts is the wastage of money. The essay will discuss this issue using examples to support arguments and demonstrate points.
On the one hand, building infrastructures, roads, schools, hospitals are essential for the safety of the people, which requires spending a numerous amount of money by governments. Full-filling the basic needs is essential for the development and it determines the quality of life that most citizens have. For example, a recent study conducted by Education Today shows that the countries, which spend more money on education sector, have a population that is higher in literacy, by 65%, compared to those countries, which allocate no money to education. Therefore, it is apparent that spending on public services is of great importance for a government.
However, it does not mean that the government should not allocate fund for visual arts. The arts also have a considerable impact on our happiness. For instance, the result of contemporary research of World Health Organization shows that these people who go to art galleries at least once in a month are happier, by 20% than these people who do not visit art galleries. From this example, it is clear that art is also essential for the well-being of people.
To conclude, although the principal responsibility of a government is to provide all the public services to it’s citizen, it is also important to allocate a proportion of it’s budget for the development of visual arts. In the future, government should take initiatives to make a balance for budgeting both.
- The consumption of three spread between 1981 and 2007 67
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 67
- The city council of Town x has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in the public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs 63
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...nts spend money on both art visual arts as well as on projects to improve the quality of l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to make a balance for budgeting both.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07467532468 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93644376302 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8162958925 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197006231997 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734053627183 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487543908089 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128597461528 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595555818094 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.