The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the level of violent crime in society. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, in order to increase dramatic factors, adding some horror and violent scenes into films is becoming a prevalent trend among all the renowned directors. It acts as a precursor of some public arguments that whether these scenes should be controlled by the governments to limit the violent actions in real life. I totally agree with this view and I am discussing some reasons why governments had better enact regulations about the violent sector in films and television in this essay.
It can be immediately obvious that society is affected deeply because of the popular violent trend in some films and television programs. People in modern society are easier to find and watch some films and TV than in previous time thanks to the development of science and technology. This social advantage does more harm than good because violent scenes on the TV and the internet can be access to a limitless extent at any time. People can be evoked some intrinsic motivation leading to some evil actions in real-life because of seeing violence continuously and aggressively. For example, any person who watches a bad behavior on TV tends to imitate and does this action with his wife, children, even the inferior staff of his company. All these effects cause an increase in the number of crimes, which bring large and deep risks to our sociality.
The above-mentioned trend in some series of thrilling films not only affects adults’ actions but also children's mental health. It takes a major contributor to the huge fears and obsessions of children, which makes them always anxious, frustrated. Moreover, it indirectly affects the study results, slows down the improvement process of children, and has wrong awareness of violence.
In conclusion, because of the tremendous above-mentioned effects and adverse consequences, I am convinced that the government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the level of violent crime in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-09 | trangluu1598 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | hunglg | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the level of violent crime in society Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that having a permanent job is better than enjoying the job Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe the purpose of education is to prepare people to be useful members for society Others say that the purpose of education is to achieve personal ambitions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 749, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...lms are rated as policy, there are many times audience who are under the required age...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, still, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95626822157 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01476334641 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568513119534 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.260987982 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12392124392 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357349918945 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400120773325 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789607840831 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348515755019 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 749, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...lms are rated as policy, there are many times audience who are under the required age...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, still, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95626822157 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01476334641 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568513119534 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.260987982 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12392124392 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357349918945 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400120773325 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789607840831 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348515755019 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.