Government should find scientific research rather than commercial organization. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement.
Some people think that scientific research should not be monopolized by private companies, but a government ought to fund it and as a result control it. I partially agree with this opinion, as commercial organizations should work together with politicians for a greater good of the nations. But at the same time, they should be able to maintain a certain level of freedom, as well as professional competitiveness.
There is a multitude of significant subjects that require immediate research and development, health end environment being, in my opinion, the most prominent. They are the ones, that should be sponsored and overlooked by the government's specialists, as no private company should be allowed to monopolize their findings. For example, research into Covid-19 vaccine, taking place at Oxford University, is being sponsored in a great percentage by a government. As a result, if the trials are successful, the government will have a say in the distribution and immunization schedule. Otherwise, we might end up with very expensive, maybe even exclusive vaccine.
On the other side, scientific research should be free of political bias and censorship. There are countries, where without private companies, certain studies would have never taken place. Unfortunately, that is the situation in Poland, where the ruling party has a very strong connotation with the Catholic Church. As a result, the research into, as well as in-vitro fertilization method itself, are very controversial and restricted. If it was not for commercial organizations, many families would have no access to it at all. Thanks to the competitiveness between research facilities, Poland was able to achieve a very high standard of the in-vitro method, making it the most successful one in Europe.
On conclusion, scientific research is so crucial that it requires constant and intense support of the government, but at the same time, private organizations should benefit from freedom from censorship and utilise they ambitions to reach the heights of discovery.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 78
- Space exploration 73
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places that are difficult such as Sahara and Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 67
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving their first punishment Why is this happening and measures can be taken to tackle the problem 89
- Why is the number of bikes increasing What can be down 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as in-vitro fertilization method itself, are very controversial and restricted. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, well, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.409375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22429588971 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9302477419 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202096298581 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658758131862 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553974253649 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130488151975 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055056787876 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.