The government should invest more money in science education rather than subjects to develope the country.
These days the development of education acts a fundamentalist role in thriving a country and in order to achieve the success we cannot forgo the significant contribution of educational science. Although bringing many benefits for national interest, this essay disagrees with the perspective suppose that the science education is the sole generally contributor.
In the one hand, scientific subjects are concentrate in researching about the natural phenomenon in the environment or theory, its consequence benefits for many aspects of the country. Firstly, learning scientific subjects can help students broaden thinking ability and expanding level of perception. By contacting with massive difficult problems and logical thinking requires, the student can have the objective and independent thought when assessing daily circumstances. Secondly, by substantially investing in educational science, the bounty of high-level scientists have the possibility to emerge. Those people whose technical specialized knowledge will constructively and important contribution to the country.
In the other hand, not only the scientific subjects have its role, the social disciplines can also foster the country’s progress. Researching about society is the assistance for us to have an insight awareness about the motivation and developmental process of humanity, hence comprehend the magnificent and splendid values of the world. For example, history assists the posterity a comprehension about events in the past. Students will gain the accurate insight and judgement therefor have precious experience. Another subject as literature. The knowledge of literature make us the penetrating sensibilities about humane values, human love and direct us toward a massive social mercy. By learning this discipline, people understand the feeling deep in their soul and to be pathetic with surround people.
In conclusion, although developments in science have led to many beneficial advantageous for most countries, science alone is not the key contributor to a country’s progress. In my view, the most country would benefit greater from a more well-rounded education, with emphasis on all disciplines, not only that science.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-15 | kakaloc1681998 | 89 | view |
- Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect theenvironment. What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what ef ects does this have onanimal life and human society? 95
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why dowe need music? Is the traditional music of a country more importantthan the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 56
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- You are entering a writing competition in your local newspaper. You must write about an important person in history who you admire. 70
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
...ht and judgement therefor have precious experience. Another subject as literature. The kno...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90965732087 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27776194563 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601246105919 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.789612356 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142516124276 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442871926163 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404015492835 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895171943376 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377319922172 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.