Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for country development and progress. To what extent do you agree or not agree?
Opinions diverge on whether the government should place a heavy emphasis on science education by investing more money rather than others in order to develop the country. Although this sentiment can be justified to some certain extent, I lean forward the opposition for rational reasons.
Besides the practical applications of some science subjects, various subjects related to art also bring multiple merits for comprehensive development of students. This can be explained by the fact that when attending painting or drawing classes, students have to think meticulously to pick the right colour and have a good focus. This can train the students the ability of patience and important-decision-making skills which allow students to learn other subjects efficiently . For instance, when studying mathematics, students who don’t attend art classes are inclined to give up advanced questions rather than the attending ones. Furthermore, due to properties of the subject, students also have to virtually imagine leading to the improvement of their creativity.
Furthermore, science development is not suitable and necessary for all countries. To be more accurate, in developing countries where poverty and crime rate are concerned problems , the investment in science can not tackle these issues rather than economics or businesses. Moreover, due to globalisation, it is feasible to transfer technology through countries. For example, Vietnam has not only bought significant amount of military weapons from Russia but also rented numerous expert to boost our military power.
To sum up, investing only for science education is not suitable and brings more benefits. Therefore, I fervently advocate that the government should invest money for all kinds of subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
- Task 1 The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015
- Task 1 The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Some people think that detailed crime reports on newspapers and TV can have many disadvantages To what extent do you agree disagree 81
- Young people are committing more crimes Discuss the causes and solutions for this problem 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ents to learn other subjects efficiently . For instance, when studying mathematics...
^^
Line 2, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...For instance, when studying mathematics, students who don’t attend art classes ar...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the improvement of their creativity. Furthermore, science development is not suitable an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ty and crime rate are concerned problems , the investment in science can not tackl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65283018868 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1472487527 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633962264151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6444322567 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271428641264 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915008540544 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649052652662 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165665716235 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312453960738 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.