Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement.
Railways and roads are vital parts of the modes of transport. Both plays important roles in different sectors. Government has to give money for their smooth functioning. However, on which sector government should invest their money depends. To my view-point both sectors are important, and money should be spend on both equally and economically.
To begin with, railway sector provide facilities of transporting goods and people both. Heavy weight and large quantity materials can be transported through rails. Similarly far places can be reached easily and in less. Government has to provide this sector money so that its functions smoothly. Secondly, by including more trains , tramps , subways in this sector, burden on roads can be reduced to a great extent. With this pollution level will decline and more hazardous air particles would not bother people.
Roads are efficient and convenient way of transport. Although due to increase use of roads because of private cars, buses has negative effect on the environment. But roads are essential for the development of the country, as small quantity goods and nearest destination can be reached through buses. Government need to spend more money on connecting roads of the towns and villages with main roads so that a network can be established. People will get benefitted by this as their mobility will get increased with more convenience and in less time.
To conculsion, it could be said railways and roads are part and parcels for the development of the country and money spend on these sectors should be such that facilitates it's smooth working. Government need to spend money on both sectors but taking into consideration their need at particular time that whose needs are important at given time.
- Today more people are traveling than before. Why is this case? What are the benefits of traveling for the traveler? 56
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 56
- Many people believe that the next world war will happen as a result of conflicts over water Is this fear justified Give reasons for your answer 56
- Charges for entrance to museums is seen by many as a tax on education How far do you agree with the statement 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...tors are important, and money should be spend on both equally and economically. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd on both equally and economically. To begin with, railway sector provide fa...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: Heavyweight
... of transporting goods and people both. Heavy weight and large quantity materials can be tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...rials can be transported through rails. Similarly far places can be reached easily and in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...thly. Secondly, by including more trains , tramps , subways in this sector, burden...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ondly, by including more trains , tramps , subways in this sector, burden on roads...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r particles would not bother people. Roads are efficient and convenient way o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, as to, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20422535211 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72354954756 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4071752556 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1111111111 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163925253783 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564096722043 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502408559578 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114300048586 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404034425068 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.