Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

There is now a contentious argument over whether government should build more railway gauge rather than spending on roads. I completely agree with the opinion that government should build more railway gauge because it is faster and commuters get to their destination in time and there will be reduction of gridlock on our roads.
The main reason I support the opinion is because train is more faster compare to vehicle and commuters get to their destination on time. Government should budget on constructing more railways to ease transportation system. For instance, British government has lay more emphasis on building more railway network in addition to existing ones, so as to ease the traffic flow within the cities and Morocco is not left out this, currently working on the fastest train in Africa. Therefore, if more railways are build transportation will be easier and boast economy.
Furthermore, constructing more railways will definitely reduce number of cars on our road because most people will prefer to go by train therefore, gridlock will reduce on the road so also, emissions from cars will also reduce thereby making our environment free from pollution. It is part of unique way to control emission from combusting engines.
In conclusion, I totally agree that government should construct more railways instead of roads because railways will ease transportation and reduce the gridlock on our road.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-09-11 Ahmad_off 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...support the opinion is because train is more faster compare to vehicle and commuters get to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...y network in addition to existing ones, so as to ease the traffic flow within the cities...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25991189427 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82027106066 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533039647577 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.083675263 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181137808852 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977335303019 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916811857876 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136265565113 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996538385578 0.056905535591 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.