Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this 21st century, railway and road transport, both are the major source of income for many countries of the world. Governments ought to be spend more money on railways rather than spending upon roads. I partially agree with this statement.
On the one hand, there are three types of transportation systems : Airplane, railways and road transportation. Mostly, airways are utilized by the businessmen or travel to other nation. But common people are used to with railways and roads so, it is sine-qua-non for authors to use wealth upon both of these. The price of railway ticket is too low vis-a-vis other transportation systems. Owing to affordable price and frequent routs, individuals prefer to travel through it and to reach their destination. For an instance, if people are working in a compan -- which is situated 50 or 60 kilometers far from their own place. For going work, If they use personal vehicle, it might be expensive compared to railway.
On the other hand, most of the mankinds have their own vehicle : bike; car. Because its dream of humans, having their personal vehicle. They are using for personal use ; at the time of emergency. In the world, many of the people have full filled their needs by driving. It helps the government to increase economy of the nation. For an example, when people buy anu vehicle, at that time they pay some types of taxes : G.S.T, Insurance, R.T.O tax and many more. Not only these these kind of taxes but also toll tax - while driving upon service road. All the taxes are collected by the authors.
To recapitulate, it is better to spend money on both railways and roads, are affordable for citizens and beneficial for governments because both raise the national income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- People in this 21st century enjoying better life quality compared people who lived in the previous centuries Advantage aand disadvantage 61
- The Pie Charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 67
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three diffrent areas of crime in Panama city from 2010 to 2019 80
- The bar chart below gives information about scoence qualifications held by people in two countries
- The government investment in Arts music and theatre is waste of money governments should invest this fund in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd frequent routs, individuals prefer to travel through it and to reach their des...
^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: T
...time they pay some types of taxes : G.S.T, Insurance, R.T.O tax and many more. No...
^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: O
... types of taxes : G.S.T, Insurance, R.T.O tax and many more. Not only these these...
^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: these
...ance, R.T.O tax and many more. Not only these these kind of taxes but also toll tax - while...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...R.T.O tax and many more. Not only these these kind of taxes but also toll tax - while driv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91780821918 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65042895752 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0646139863 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5789473684 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73684210526 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162299448085 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504151051171 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794170507015 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131166853867 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996140799038 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.