Government should spend more money on education than on recreation and sport. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that the government ought to supply more funds on education rather than entertainment and physical activities. However, I completely disagree with this opinion and think that politicians should raise more money for both of these sides.
On the one hand, it cannot deny that academic achievement plays an essential role in our life. For instance, most universities will choose their candidates based on the results which they had gained in high school. As the recruitments do not have enough time for judging all of the individuals. Moreover, education contributes to people's knowledge. It will enhance each person knowing in different fields. The more awareness you earn, the more chances you will earn. For example the higher position in companies or higher grades at school. Besides, good education will make people feel more confident to communicate with other people because of the widening knowledge in your head.
On the other hand, although education gives individuals a huge value benefits, I also think that the government should incorporate education into physical activities and enjoyment. Firstly, sports and recreation take advantage of physical and mental health. Students who usually do exercises will feel stronger and healthier. In this sense, sports make people relax after hard-working periods. They will have opportunities to approach to environment and open spaces, which makes workers feel more comfortable than a narrow space at school or company. In other words, naturally promotes human effective energy. The original atmosphere can help people develop their creativity. It is also the reason why companies frequently organize outside activities for their employees and most schools have physical subjects in students' schedules.
In conclusion, education is the main key to help people reach success. However, sports and entertainment are also important things to contribute to this invaluable process.
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals ass individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think one should stay all their life in the same job whereas others advocate changing a job from time to time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals ass individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- In some countries the average worker is obliged to retire at the age of 50 while in others people can work until they are 65 or 70 It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for t 78
- Government should spend more money on education than on recreation and sport Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nts do not have enough time for judging all of the individuals. Moreover, education contri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...als. Moreover, education contributes to peoples knowledge. It will enhance each person ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55033557047 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83810101134 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.474147164 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247422024462 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608891697241 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609452755034 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147970126092 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689434477038 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.