Artists being subsidized by the governments had earn criticism as some assert that it is a waste of the country’s monetary fund and can be spent to fund important matters. This essay will discuss both views and will give the writer’s opinion in the end.
Various artists such as painters, sculptors and musicians are being funded by the government in order to continue their crafts. This is because they bear the name and pride of the whole nation. For instance, Fernando Amorsolo was one of the Filipino painters known world-wide due to the support given by the previous Marcos regime and is considered a national artist. It promotes and protects the country’s cultural heritage and keeps it alive for the next generation to witness. Moreover, it aids in economic development. As an example, Amorsolo’s artworks create revenues to the government by selling it to the highest bidder in an auction. Also in Dubai, numerous murals, paintings and sculptures are displayed and can be seen in public places such as parks, commercial establishments and public transportation that foretold the Arab’s lifestyle, culture and traditions which gives information to the people and a way of promoting tourism. Even more important, these artists had accomplished their jobs and worked professionally, therefore, it is fair, rightful and just that they will receive compensation for the service that they have rendered.
On the other side of the coin, a certain minority affirm that this financial support is being wasted on arts and should be channelled to other important things like education, health, economic development and more, specifically to those who are in the third world country. For example, in some rural areas, schools and health centres are inaccessible to all, whereas, in some places electrical and water supply are inadequate to suffice the population. Therefore, they needed more support and must be a priority by the local and national government.
After positing the above arguments, the writer believes though it is important to aid the country’s acclaimed artists, it is also vital that the government should address other issues that are necessary for the welfare of the many. They should prioritize, carefully plan and manage the nation’s budget wisely to make sure that the needs of their subjects are met. Also, they can ask for the help of non-government agencies and other private institutions to sponsor some artists and some programs of the government to avoid conflict.
In conclusion, governments helping artists monetarily is inevitable as well as allocating budget for the country’s other needs, so it is a must that they should budget and spend the money well to avoid wastage.
- Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- people sleep less than before in many countries. why people sleep less? what effect does it have individually and in society? 73
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia 11
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why traveled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destination over the same period.Write a report for a 78
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world’s fuel resourches. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...being subsidized by the governments had earn criticism as some assert that it is a w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...being subsidized by the governments had earn criticism as some assert that it is a w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31350114416 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02002282911 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54004576659 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6874386123 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.588235294 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7058823529 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149367069114 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441281059825 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455030675148 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858620561552 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454193259962 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.