Some people believed that knowing the past is no longer relevant to our present lives. It is because they want to leave the unpleasant memories behind. However, it is entirely disagreeable. Our past has a great influence on what we are now today.
I often hear some people say that the past is past, everything is history, and those events occurred were no longer important. This is a form of self-defense mechanism for those who undergone into dark days of their lives. They want to cocoon themselves from the possible trauma, bad memories, and negative feelings it may unleash, once the doors of their past are opened. On the contrary, some thought that everything was done and there is no other way that we can undo it. Hence, it is wise to move on and continue with their lives at present.
The past is the reason why we exist. It teaches us vital lessons. For instance, in the Philippines government, a lot of presidents and government officials are reflecting on past governance to help them boost the country's economy and prevent them from repeating the same mistakes like changing the constitution and proclaiming Martial Law. Moreover, numerous numbers of mummies dug by the archeologist in different parts of the world aid in the study of the cure of different diseases. The past is part of our history that leads to the prosperous present.
To conclude, Education, and emotional support is need by those who do not value the past. Whereas, studying and awareness of the past is unequivocally important. It enables us to be a better human being.
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 56
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia 11
- Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why traveled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destination over the same period.Write a report for a 78
- Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84701492537 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74522155168 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6275477186 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4117647059 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217078304783 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639195720381 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529071331645 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126781890384 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398930262622 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.