Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is convinced that the biggest cost which is given by governments should distributed to railways not to roads. Personaly, I definitely on the different path because of some important reasones.
First of all, it is a general knowledge that roads are used by many people with various kinds of vehicles. This proves that the roads have a greater role for the general public which need to pay more attantion to their facilities. For example, the main street in the midle of city is normally crowded by citizens who through it to go to work or school in every single day by public transportation or private vehicle. In short, there are more road users than train users that required more concern in every part which surely comes with high charge.
Even so, there are some drawbacks to keep in line following this matter. Firstly, many roads fasilities are suboptimally built which are caused by lack of funds. It is due to the fee is only for optimizing railroad fasilities when it should be an equal distribution or over for highway construction. For instance, roads in urban areas are breaking down quickly because they are often used by many people from time to time and when it was damaged, patching is an instant solution whereas it should be regenerated. Therefore, the government should give more funds for the welfare of roadway users because there are more of them. Secondly, a lot of people would be indignant when multi-accident were occurred which were sourced by road damage beside it could be fixed properly. This is caused by insufficient charges for road repaires or public interest on the highway in stepchildren. For the model, lots of mishap take place on the hollow path in the central of town which inviting more attention from local people and surely blame the government for this problem. So that, the allocation of grant for roadway is more necessary rather than railway.
To sum up where my track, spending a lot of money for railway then less for highway is not good decision because roads have more users rather than railroads. The government should be wiser in deciding this policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- In the future more people will choose to go on holiday in their own country and not travel abroad no holiday 11
- Average cinema visits by age groups 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
- The chart explained the percentage of households with electrical appliances and the number of hours of housework per week in 1920 to 2019 84
- The charts show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'general knowledge'.
Suggestion: general knowledge
...mportant reasones. First of all, it is a general knowledge that roads are used by many people with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...t the roads have a greater role for the general public which need to pay more attantion to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, even so, for example, for instance, in short, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83701657459 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60503096317 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538674033149 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7065875656 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195747734881 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705977537111 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496359098934 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139921666129 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593098883875 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.