Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The issue of whether authority should take investments for railroads instead of roads remains a matter for debate. Personally, I am against this idea due to its drawbacks that are discussed below.
it costs an excess of money to build station platform and use specialized trains to make sure the safety, modern and environmentally friendly. For example, the Ho Chi Minh City Metro project has started construction since 2017 and has spent numerous government budget as well as ODA funding. However, this project is not likely to be completed on time in 2020 because of an increasing number costs.
On the other hand, roads would ensure more convenient transportation to connect this economic region to other economic zones, contributing to promoting economic development. For instance, it would be easier to transport agricultural products from rural to urban by roadways than by rail transport. this example makes it clear why many people support this stance. Moreover, there are various vehicles on the road, which confirms roadways will be more popular and more convenient than railways. We can not use bicycles, motorbikes or cars on rails, but these ones can be moved on roads.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that the government should not spend the capital on increasing railroads rather than roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | sakshi111 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... drawbacks that are discussed below. it costs an excess of money to build stati...
^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ban by roadways than by rail transport. this example makes it clear why many people ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...ycles, motorbikes or cars on rails, but these ones can be moved on roads. For the reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 213.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23474178404 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80444035681 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.68544600939 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2603032109 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.363636364 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160387472311 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587860952468 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609260620751 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11092877362 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736072939128 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.