Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree and disagree.
I totally disagree with the statement that governmental bodies should spend funds on railroads instead of roadways as it stands to be the waste of time as well as great amount of money.
Firstly, to construct the railway tracks it consumes a long time and in the given time frame large portion of a nation can complete constructing roadways. Even to build a single track it can occupy around 10 to 12 days, and to complete the full track it takes 7-8 years, while roadways can take up to two to three years to complete. For instance, as per the project named railway construction carried out by world bank, it will take almost ten years to construct 250 km long track, while in the nearby locality project by the same group took around five years to complete road construction of similar length.
Secondly, roadways are much more flexible and it has greater facility than compared to railways. Although railways are luxurious, given the expenses of travelling, roadways can have a great deal of comfort zone as with minimum expenses. Moreover, railways do require extra materials and huge manpower to construct and it is not possible to construct in every region without proper analysis. For example, in countries like Nepal with the tall Himalayas and high hills, the geographical placement will make it far more complicated to construct railway tracks which makes it too expensive.
To conclude, expenses in the railway is a waste or time and money and I do not think that spending money on the railway is superb than constructing roadways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | tahmeed20192020 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Biamsaul | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Adithya999 | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | Sattty | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | Sattty | 11 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 67
- Some believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I totally disagree with the statement th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime as well as great amount of money. Firstly, to construct the railway tracks...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uild a single track it can occupy around 10 to 12 days, and to complete the full ...
^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...tion carried out by world bank, it will took almost ten years to construct 250 km lo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tracks which makes it too expensive. To conclude, expenses in the railway is ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8783269962 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65687250439 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577946768061 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.0549859233 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.555555556 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2222222222 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134138276141 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676042165249 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809637787953 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147575444819 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973580526888 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.3001002004 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.