Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
By daily advancement in industries, these days, it seems inevitable that authorities must improve all means of transportation networks, including railroads and autobahns. It is a matter of debate that whether improving the rail nets should be given the priority or not. I agree with this idea to some extent and in the following essay both sides will be scrutinised.
People who support a greater investment on the train system have some reasons in favour of their request. Having ability of mass-transportation, is claimed as the most important reality which can be attributed to the trains. Without any doubt, the huge size of the things that could be carried by a train in one journey could give it a remarkable superiority over the road transport. Moreover, considering the incredible speed of new trains, might be another factor that could make all the domestic and international trips much more convenient and faster than cars and buses. If we want to take traveling in a long distance as an example, everybody can take advantage of the impressive facilities and garment restaurants that an advanced train is got equipped.
However, it sounds more logical that governments invest equally on autobahns and smaller roads as well as railroads. If a country expands its road networks, even the most out-centered villagers will have the opportunity to be connected to other part of the continent. Vastly branched roads in Germany could be claimed as a good example of accessibility that people who lives in derelict town could be benefited from it. Furthermore, driving a private vehicle can give ts driver the great control over rout and destination section at any given time. This is a crucial privilege of the car drivers over a person who travels by a train and naturally has its own limitation in stop stations and ultimate destination.
To sum up, although by considering the size and speed of a train, it may appear logical for more railway investment, but in my point of view spending money on roads and autobahns should not be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while other believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both view 73
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 78
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oad networks, even the most out-centered villagers will have the opportunity to b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99707602339 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96705258573 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8399594731 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120385888354 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395835246911 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496192103517 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826633836133 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445477923961 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.