Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone.
Do you agree or disagree?
Apparently, group works could bring about numerous essential life skills for people, from collaboration to communication skills. But despite this discussion, I reckon that in order to achieve essential skills for living, both individual and team activities are of the essence at the same level. On the one hand, as mentioned above, there are a considerable number of advantages associated with teamwork helping every person gain necessary life skills.
In other words, playing a role in a team teaches the abilities which do not make sense while doing them alone. Take negotiation as an example. It is not viable to improve the art of negotiating and convincing other people in individual activities. As another instance, in teamwork, the members of the
team learn to share the activities which are needed to reach the final objective. This improves social and collaborative skills.
On the contrary, based on the type of goal and the personality of people, alone working provides some useful benefits to improve skills. For instance, introverted people are extremely more efficient when doing works privately.
Additionally, the nature of some activities is based on single work and concentration. In this kind of
works, a different group of life skills are developed.
For example, it is more acceptable to cook individually rather than in a group, because in this kind of work nothing beneficial is learnt in a group.
To conclude, although both individual and team activities have the potential of bringing about some opportunities to learn skills for life, none of them could outweigh the other due to different kinds of
people and works. It is useful for parents, schools and employers to plan for a mixture of both types to receive the best results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about numerous essential life skills for people, from collaboration to communicat...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstance, in teamwork, the members of the team learn to share the activities which...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Team
...ce, in teamwork, the members of the team learn to share the activities which are...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the type of goal and the personality of people, alone working provides some usef...
^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work and concentration. In this kind of works, a different group of life skills ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Works
... and concentration. In this kind of works, a different group of life skills are d...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eigh the other due to different kinds of people and works. It is useful for paren...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...the other due to different kinds of people and works. It is useful for parents, sc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, so, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, kind of, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23776223776 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90855293573 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4488730694 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286187681988 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859074010664 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584393189146 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118654468121 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379138593352 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.