A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis

Nowadays, some people think that animals should be treated as human beings. They are also creatures of god so, they deserve the same rights as the living. Killing them for research is not ideal but others argue by saying that it is important for us to develop human society. I will discuss both views in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, the benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused. There are alternative methods of research. The lives of animals should be respected. Humans have no moral right to do experiments on animals. Moreover, Vegetarians do not eat foods that are produced by killing animals. Many people choose a vegetarian diet for moral or health reasons. A healthy diet is possible without eating meat. It is unnecessary to kill animals for food.

On the flip side, Animals are used in important scientific research. It is necessary to do medical tests on new drugs. Animal testing helps to advance medical and scientific knowledge. Many important medical discoveries involved experimentation on animals. Researchers aim to minimize the suffering that animals experience. Testing for the cosmetics industry is now banned in many countries.

In conclusion, I would like to say that It is completely natural for us to kill them for food. But our aim should be to improve farming methods. Farms should produce organic food.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to do experiments on animals. Moreover, Vegetarians do not eat foods that are pr...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustry is now banned in many countries. In conclusion, I would like to say that ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11061946903 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76054070982 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588495575221 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0520863703 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 55.0 106.682146367 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.7619047619 20.7667163134 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337345679228 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946022840092 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725712031191 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198640532371 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702035879804 0.056905535591 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.0946893788 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 50.2224549098 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.17 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.