A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including for food and research. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Animal needs in our daily life is becoming increasingly popular. Some people believes that is necessary for human to utilize in order to satisfy multiple requirement while others do not. This essay will discuss both side of the argument in detail and provide evidence as to why people need animals to maintain daily basis.
On the one hand, some people believe that mankind should not exploit animal for various reasons. Firstly, animals diversity is being damaged heavily by mankind from illegal hunting and manufacturing purpose. By stop using animal products, human coud avoid the animals extinction outcome. Secondly, it is cruel to keep exploiting animals for food, medicine testing and others mankind needs. PETA, which is the largest animal rights organization in the world, has proved that keeping animals for multiple purpose is inhuman and this should be stop no matter what.
On the other hand, i believe that it is more benefictial to maintain ultilizing animal for our needs. The first reason is that having meat in our daily is ultimately nutritious. Animals meat has been using by mankind for an enternity since the first day human knew how to hunt which mean it has been proved to be the most efficient method. The second reason is that reasearching on human, especially newly medical research that haven’t tested on animal is extremely forbidden in many countries because it could be vastly dangerous to a human being. If a failed hazardous medical test occurred, it could cost a human life
In conclusion, I believe that ultilizing animal for human needs is ultimately superior. Although the government should implement policies to protect endangered animal and reduce animal cruety
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-21 | @evelyn_2810 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-01 | VINITA SHARMA | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-16 | viet561995 | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-15 | viet561995 | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-30 | selenophile | 67 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London 100
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 78
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including for food and research Discuss both view and give your opinion 78
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including for food and research Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...g animal products, human coud avoid the animals extinction outcome. Secondly, it is cru...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stopped'?
Suggestion: stopped
...e purpose is inhuman and this should be stop no matter what. On the other hand, i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...p no matter what. On the other hand, i believe that it is more benefictial to ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18772563177 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57647437978 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563176895307 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.439738488 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367393487466 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134197846394 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056666157112 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232530748233 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555014073263 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.