With a growing world population, one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Humankind plays a critical part in the development of the world, the more we develop and reproduce over time the more issues our nature ought to solve increase as well, one of which is supply’s consumption. Majority of people tend to think that genetically modifying the food is one ideal solution to this situation because of its benefits.
Firstly, pesticide is not applied to genetically modified method. Several articles have indicated the carefulness of pesticide on human’s health is obviously more than their usefulness. For example, when human body consumes non-organic food, the chemical which is used to destroy incest stay in their metabolism, these chemical continue to agglomerate and slightly demolish their organs over time due to its hazard on human’s health. Surprisingly, a few researches have pointed out that using GM suppliers is healthier than the traditional agriculture's technique.
Secondly, the outcome of this technique has been proved to be equal or even higher than usual agricultural system. The amounts of stock ought to be increased by the population. For instance, world’s population in 2010 has risen by twice in the last few years, therefore, reserve ought to grow twice as much in order to fuel every last person on Earth.
In the end, because of Genetically Modifying the food is better for both physically and mentally, I strongly agree that GM method is a possible way to provide food for an enormous group of people. By the time the world’s population reaches its highest of all time, GM technology will have proved its potential, therefore, why not apply it sooner?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | Mygoalis9inieltstest | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | Louisa_Nguyễn | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-24 | jul_hoang | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | azxx | 69 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'agricultures'' or 'agriculture's'?
Suggestion: agricultures'; agriculture's
...liers is healthier than the traditional agricultures technique. Secondly, the outcome of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1825095057 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87447944922 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615969581749 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4077298662 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.909090909 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13520750527 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463343689595 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544965386265 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825237360435 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052113973099 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.