Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person’s income. The health of a person is in their own hands and they should, therefore, be held accountable for that. Do you agree with this opinion?
The shown statement argued that because people should take full responsibility for their own health, government are not supposed to offer free health care for citizens. This view is awfully wrongheaded, and I am strongly against it.
First of all, there are enormous factors which affect the health of a person that it is simply biased to blame individuals for their health problems. Environmental issues, for example, are also detrimental to personal health. A real life proof is that there are thousands of people in Japan who suffered from the Fukushima accident which resulted from radiation leak of nuclear power plant. In this case, it is the government who should be held accountable for the health of citizens rather than individuals. How could government walk away from the responsibility to offer health care for the victims?
Furthermore, the fast development of capitalism as well as corporate lobbyist meddling in legislation has significantly reshaped the health, medicine and insurance industry, which unfortunately makes it incredibly expensive for the working class to access affordable health care. In fact, the health insurance company commonly abuse their information advantage over devastating patients, which usually causes them extra financial pressure to get reasonable insurance coverage. An outrageous example is a hedge fund manager purchased the patent of an effective AIDs medicine to raise the price from $13.5 to $750, in order to make a fortune out of the suffering of patients. Therefore, government as lawmaker is crucial for protecting unprivileged citizens from greedy corporations.
Not to mention the basic role of government is to serve for the wellbeing of its people regardless of their social classes. It is defiantly irresponsible for the government to avoid to take care of public health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-06 | hana287 | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-20 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students en 66
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness. Do you think people can be happy without much money? What other factors contribute towards happiness? 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of the surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 86
- Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture Do you think it is important for children to be taught art Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 73
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid taking'.
Suggestion: avoid taking
...tly irresponsible for the government to avoid to take care of public health.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43356643357 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02419862106 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.957033667 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341923944114 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128356505908 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976525122809 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214138201585 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080372395583 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.