A highly controversial issue today relates to whether to supporting the relationship between enterprises and traditions from all over the world or not. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then give my own opinion on the matter.
A highly controversial issue today relates to whether to supporting the relationship between enterprises and traditions from all over the world or not. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then give my own opinion on the matter.
On the side of the argument there are people who argue that the benefits of increasing organization and traditional value considerably outweigh its disadvantages for not only society but also cultures. The main reason for believing this is that if multinational companies increasingly expand their businesses in a country, they will offer numerous of job opportunities for local residents. Therefore, this trend leads to unemployment rate being reduced as well as the standard of living being improved. Furthermore, by this way, local companies are forced to be more creative and innovative to prove themselves in global market, thus, boosting their productivity. Take, for example, Vingroup in Vietnam, which has experienced a significant change ranging from small shops to an array of large industries covering many important sectors, such as education and medical care. Finally, when exposed to different traditional identities, people would have a deep understanding about other cultures, thereby avoiding cultural shocks or unwanted intense conflicts.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact this development would pose a threat to important national and traditional values. This is due to international companies bringing their own cultures to wherever they settle down, directly affecting the belief and current lifestyles in the surrounding environment. Consider the acceptance of same sex marriages, which used to be strongly opposed in the past in Vietnam. Another case in point, the appearance of fast food chains, like KFC, changes eating habits of individuals by providing an alternative option. This underestimates the importance of family meals as the way older generations did.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however I feel that business and traditional contacts should be encouraged. This is due to the cultural and social advantages it brings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-25 | quochung95.ftu2@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The table makes a comparison of the number of tourists in the UK and their average spending over the 5 years period from 2003 to 2008 73
- In conclusion although some people are in favour of sharing academic knowledge freely I strongly believe that the government should enact more suitable policies in order to guarantee the benefit for companies and individuals 84
- The pie chart displays the changes in the proportion of water consumption and the bar chart illustrates the changes in the percentage of water use in Australia in 2004
- A highly controversial issue today relates to whether to supporting the relationship between enterprises and traditions from all over the world or not In this essay I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then give my own opinion 89
- Generally speaking public transport represented the highest percentage of phone usage and family feasts recorded the least phone productivity Additionally elders relied on their phones less than others 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44827586207 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08426382035 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66091954023 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0471138515 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.529411765 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356926067228 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10078537867 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174992292583 0.0667982634062 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297928254952 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.375315678111 0.056905535591 660% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.