However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments.
Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?
Some people tend to believe that experimenting on other species is bad and such activities should be banned while a few others argue that such experiments are crucial for scientific advancements. This essay will discuss that experimentations on animals is not justified and possible alternatives for the same.
To begin with, conducting research and performing various trials on animals can be regarded as animal cruelty. Species captured for research and development are taken away from their natural habitat and bred in captivity, such actions disturb the ecological balance of the environment. Moreover, experiments tend to have several negative effects on animals resulting in their death. For instance, the cosmetic industry tests their products on various domestic animals such as dogs and cats. While it is a known fact that dogs are allergic to most of the substances used in cosmetics still the trials are never banned or regulated. Thus, scientific discoveries or advancements achieved through cruelty against animals are not worth the praise.
Further, in the contemporary world there are many solutions that can serve as an alternative to animal testing. Rather than experimenting on animals, many large research and development organizations are opting for virtual testing, in other words using software advancements in the field of science. Developing an application which can run the required experiments by gathering the DNA of humans and the effects it can when exposed to tests has been achieved in few countries. Government can also regulate or impose strict laws on experimenting on animals; doing so if no might reduce the number of tests on them.
To conclude, no matter the outcome, animal cruelty can never be justified. Scientists can opt for other alternatives to make their discoveries.
- The chart shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 89
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- Some people feel that boarding schools are an excellent option for children while other people disagree for many reasons Consider both sides of this debate and conclude 61
- Rates of smoking in Someland 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for instance, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40492957746 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01328433172 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3529943367 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382629375855 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127110703991 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768176929084 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239121775826 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403121620977 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.