Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?
It is critically argued that any form of experimentation should not be carried out on animals as it contradicts morality and should be restricted. Nonetheless, as essential to scientific progress, these research play a crucial role in broadening the scope of knowledge for mankind. I contend that such activities could be justified for numerous existential applications nowadays but the efficacy of other methods should also be considered.
For one thing, laboratory experiments determine its impact on humans during the process of use as well as ensure the quality of medicine. Interestingly, certain species inherently share relative resemblances in terms of genetics with humans, this is deemed a huge advantage for researchers to apply clinical trials on them to hopefully record any chemical reactions. In turn, for such results conducted from the tests, it could be predicted the similar conditions when patients take that prescribed medication. The testing process by which animals are used could also guarantee the outcome of the research, given the potential side-effects involved could be minimized so as to eliminate the perennial implications on humans.
For another, due to the trenchant criticisms for animal rights, other initiatives in scientific investigation could be taken into account. Chief of which is utilizing the superiority of computers. Technological applications could be useful as the accuracy of algorithms outsmart humans efficiently. By encoding the data for each research, they could provide scientists with reliable outcomes in a fraction of a second. Hence, based on specialized experience, expertises can easily conclude the accurate amount of chemical substance and an appropriate way to produce drugs. As a result, not only could it save a tremendous amount of time but also reduce the human resources to focus on other missions.
In conclusion, regardless of the demand for animals in scientific research as well as its effectiveness in real-world applications, alternatives in experimentation could be adopted for ethically tangible results.
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one s own family Why do people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 61
- Many parents choose to teach their children at home instead of sending them to school Do you think the benefits of homeschooling outweigh its disadvantages 78
- The values that we learn from our parents and family have a greater influence on our future success than knowledge and skills we learn from school To what extent do you agree or disagree 14
- As children become adults their social behavior changes in some ways What are the main differences between young children s social behavior and that of adults To what extent are the changes that take place good 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ide-effects involved could be minimized so as to eliminate the perennial implications on...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nonetheless, second, so, well, as to, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6253968254 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27840456746 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612698412698 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9492402015 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263937969638 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911306948229 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10004952841 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183524868934 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832385570318 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.