Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
No longer are the flora and fauna of Mother Nature abundant and diverse, they are justifiably damaged by human activities. Opinions diverge on whether people are behindhand with preserving the species, instead of striving to come up with any measures to tackle this situation. Although this sentiment can be justified to some certain extent, I am in opposition owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, some assume that humans are too late to prevent myriad catastrophes leading to negative effects on plant and animal species. This can be explained by the fact that the number of living creatures is remarkably declining, conversely, the quantity of extinct species is beyond the reach of people. Perceptibly, humans cannot bring these species back. For example, residents can make a huge profit from selling woods so that they cut down trees illegally without hesitation, or people tend to deforest to pave the way for farming. All of those activities contribute to the disappearance of plants and animals, worse still, it is likely to be challenging to restore.
In contrast, I still hold onto the notion that humans are not belatedly coming to realize the essence of the environment. Evidently, deforestation is the primary factor resulting in the extinction of plant and animal species. Instead of showing disregard for this problem, the government can enforce more strict rules to avoid deforestation as well as any crimes that cause the loss of creatures such as over-logging, wood-smuggling, arson, etc.. Further and more prominently, if every citizen in a country raises awareness of legion detrimental effects that their activities have on the planet, the rest of species on the Earth will be saved and developed. Obviously, there are more things that we can do to tackle this issue.
To sum up, I believe that when people become more conscious about what they should do to the existence of plants and animals, which will herald a more liveable life in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2022-12-03 | trucvy112233 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Priyanksuthar | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ttha | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Cicihg | 89 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 67
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
No longer are the flora and fauna of Mother Nature ab...
^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'restoring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: restoring
...e still, it is likely to be challenging to restore. In contrast, I still hold onto the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...over-logging, wood-smuggling, arson, etc.. Further and more prominently, if every ...
^^
Line 5, column 729, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs that we can do to tackle this issue. To sum up, I believe that when people be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, so, still, well, for example, in contrast, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15789473684 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84847556313 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613003095975 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8972498215 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31243900102 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910784151044 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546023082681 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163414884242 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510510288989 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.