The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continuous throughout life.
There are people who believe that having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one and they may think the new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continuous throughout life. This essay below will reveal obviously about this argument.
So many years ago, when the olden generations literally thought that excellent one occupation was much better than working various careers. For example, family traditional work was concentrated and conveyed from generation by generation. Thus they can be achieved an excellent level and earn many moneys from their work. However, if the secret was lost by some reasons, whether it was lost and hold family could not find anything doing for income in life. In additional, this is becoming an obstacle for earning money and food in life.
An alternative solution could be having various careers for instead single career in the developed world. Nowadays, there are a lots of people can touch to higher education, of course this is a bright point for employer make a decision for hiring an employee. But this is not convinced the host also be excited if the candidates have a plenty of experiences helpful for job. Beside major job following their education, modern people choose online business to finding a minor source of earning money. It is the surge to prevent them from delayering trend in developed society.
In conclusion, further education to improve ourselves valuable and making several careers to adapt with the variation of the world. Because nobody knows today this job is necessary but tomorrow everything will be changed.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 56
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion mil be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continuous throughout life. 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?Discuss both these views and give your own o 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...conveyed from generation by generation. Thus they can be achieved an excellent level...
^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...he developed world. Nowadays, there are a lots of people can touch to higher education...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11029411765 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57466361561 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610294117647 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2468973035 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434914043676 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132418700174 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20937984416 0.0667982634062 313% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286368811637 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.24268181466 0.056905535591 426% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.