The increase of production of consumer goods damages the natural environment. Why is this the case? What can be done to reduce it?
These days, the need to consume goods has significantly increased and has damaged the environment. Various reasons leave behind this tendency, and suggest some solutions associated with negative environmental impacts from improper solid waste dumping and natural resources overexploitation.
Various drivers explain why consumerism can heavily influence the quality of our environment such as constructing plants or releasing the waste without treatment. First and foremost, to produce more goods, people have to clear forests, cut down trees to construct more plants or exploit more natural resources to manufacture. Deforestation has expanded, the natural habitat has been on the verge of extinction, and tons of carbon dioxide was emitted into the air. As a result, the standard of living is low and can affect our health. Furthermore, over-consumption leads to excess products which can not be solved right now and take several years to compose. Also factories can discharge contaminated waste without treatment nearby the household water sources. As a result, this destroys biodiversity and depletes the aquatic ecosystem as contaminated water causes illness and death to fish and other animals.
It seems to me that many effective solutions to the problem of damaging the environment can be invested. Firstly, the authorities should ban strict regulations on illegal activities which cause harm to the quality of the environment, such as assessing the level of emissions of each factory or taking sanctions on companies. Nevertheless, the consumer should buy what they really need in lieu of buying for satisfaction, and use non-biodegradable materials having a short lifespan which are easy to compost or recycle.
In conclusion, the environment is severely impacted by the increase in production of consumer goods. Both individuals and governments should take some actions as soon as possible to alleviate this tendency.
- Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 56
- Some people believe that children should do organised activities in their free time while other think that children should be free to do what they want to do in their free time Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that each countries provide poorer countries with other types of help rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets These people treat their birds cats or other animals as members of their family In your opinion as such relationships good Why or Why not 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...mproper solid waste dumping and natural resources overexploitation. Various drivers expl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 658, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... now and take several years to compose. Also factories can discharge contaminated wa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, really, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60068259386 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17179999442 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4797670926 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269651601988 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839684617317 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709588802845 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147238843586 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213689276292 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.