The stipulation of fossil fuel has risen globally and finding the undiscovered ares of the world to access more resources should be compulsory. To the best of my knowledge, the use of renewable resources should be the topmost priority.
At the outset, fossil fuel brings plethora of drawback and one of the most obvious deleterious impact related to global warming. To illustrate further, exposed of various kinds of poisonous gases has threaten the extinction of mankind. The use of non-renewable source of energy for long period with increasing demand damages the ecosystem, adding to their existence and survival to collapsed. The increasing temperature causes polar ice caps to melt which will lead the sea level to rise and cover some land area, which particularly affects the sea life and water habitat. Thus, protection of natural resources is the responsibility of the people, but people hardly ever thinks about the nature.
Additionally, there is no point in denying that green power technology offers a series of convenience to people and the environment. In other words, the use of solar, wind, tidal energy should be encourage in public to help natural habitat, who usually became victim of noxious gases, to improve their safety of living. Renewable energy decrease the negative effect of the virulent gases in the atmosphere, reckoning to availability of resources at cheaper, affordable and environment healthy benefits. Therefore, the undiscovered land should be protected for industrial activities.
In conclusion, although non-renewable source of energy has became basic need of people, it can destroy the environment. If the use of fossil fuels are not abandon soon, t will cost a lot in future to people as well as to nature. To sum up, the utilization of renewable source should increase with spreading the awareness to local people and the world.
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Task 1 IELTS Writing Model - Cambridge 8 Test 4 Goods transported in UK (1974 – 2002)(my friends version) 72
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 73
- Has human harmed the earth or made it a better place? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'threatened'.
Suggestion: threatened
...of various kinds of poisonous gases has threaten the extinction of mankind. The use of n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
... of solar, wind, tidal energy should be encourage in public to help natural habitat, who ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ough non-renewable source of energy has became basic need of people, it can destroy th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26333333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93145962885 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1238832888 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172997650313 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581603116066 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072886391914 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112178766007 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588324824595 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.