Increasing numbers of students are going to university instead of working after high school. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that more students are having a propensity for attending universities or colleges instead of finding a job immediately after high school. From my perspective, its demerits are overshadowed by its merits.
When students choose to enrol in higher education, one problem which can be anticipated is that students have to allocate more time on studying; as a result, they miss out the opportunities to experience employment at first hand, making them fall behind their peers who start working before them. For example, people who set up a company right after schooling are more liable to overcome difficulties than those who have just graduated from universities as the former ones possess greater practical understanding. What can be inferred from this is that graduates lack the ability to solve real-life problems, which those choosing to work after high school may have mastered.
Despite the aforementioned disadvantage, I am of the opinion that the advantages have a more significant bearing. One of them is that the higher education one receives, the better job opportunities he may be offered, especially in this knowledge-based economy. In other words, employers would recruit somebody with a Master degree rather than one with a Bachelor level, considering that the two’s backgrounds are similar. Another justification worth mentioning is that by obtaining further education, graduates will acquire a firm grasp of their fields as well as a more well-rounded knowledge about their career paths. Therefore, when they put knowledge gained into practice, their productivity will probably rise; consequently, this culminates in a more prepared and excellent workforce, which is the core of economic growth. This directly suggests that people choosing to keep pursuing education develop scholastic competence and characteristics, of which a nation’s economy can reap benefits.
In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of the trend pale in comparison to any of its advantages.
- The pie charts below show a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil 56
- It was observed that in some countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects at university What are the cases What effects does this have 89
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 37
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50649350649 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19225692902 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8705451849 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142109538759 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515816362017 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727247128043 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968420545729 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712363228996 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.