Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems
To what extend do you agree or disagree
What other measures do you think might be effective
In the context of a growing population all over the world, traffic and pollution issues have been becoming more serious than ever before. Some people believe that a rise in fuel price would be effective in dealing with these problems, however, I think that more solutions such as using clean fuel and enforcing strict punishment need to be considered in addition to a simple increase in the petrol price.
Although due to the high price of fuel, citizens might tend to switch from private cars to public transports that reduces the number of vehicles on the roads, it is unlikely to limit the number of drivers for long. Moreover, if the petrol price was increased, it would lead to higher service fees. For instance, when there is a rise in transportation fees, the seller will increase the price of products and these decisions might influence the whole economy.
One of the potential measures to tackle these problems is developing clean fuel, which is environmentally friendly. Toxic emission from vehicles is one of the main reasons causing health problems, especially respiratory disease and global warming. And clean fuel is effective in significantly reduce the dangerous emission levels. Besides, alternative fuel not only improves air quality but also is a long-term solution to deal with the root of pollution.
In the short-term, it is recommended that the government implement strict punishment. First of all, to avoid the negative consequences of growing traffic such as accidents and congestion, penalties can act as a deterrent to encourage people to drive safely. These punishments might include small fines, license suspension, driver awareness courses, and even prison sentences. Also, environmental regulation should be tightened to save the environment by preventing produce and emit waste as well as discharge industrial waste illegally.
In conclusion, traffic and environment problems are threatening human life and global existence, therefore, everyone must join hands to resolve these issues to protect themselves and their children at the present and in the future.
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinionWhat sort of punishment should parents and t 89
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a growing population all over the world, traffic and pollution issues have been b...
^^
Line 9, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and environment problems are threatening human life and global existence, therefo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36666666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89670500883 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.672540957 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14061570171 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411439992526 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373530578564 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701577774709 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526528826876 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.