In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
These days, a great number of millennials prefer small families or one-person household rather than extended families for various reasons. To my point of view, this is a positive development.
First of all, moving out of a large families to lead a solitary life helps to reduce conflict. Different generations have dissimilar values and preferences, thus, relatives who share the same roof could possibly oppose each other and develop mutual hatred. A typical example is the difference in lifestyles. While the young usually enjoy parties and stay up late, the elder prefer tranquil atmosphere and early bedtime, and as a result, conflict happens. Therefore, living in one-person household enable people to live in freedom and comfort without facing others’ constant judgement or critism.
Secondly, small families with one or two children creat favourable opportunities for people to interact with each others and offer better education. When living in large family groups, parents’ attention is likely to be distract from their children. Instead of spending time educating and communicating with their children, they have to share their time to take care of for other family members. In addition, compared to large families, it is easier for small families to organize bonding time such as picnics, shoppings, shared dinner, which strengthens family bonds.
In conclusion, I believe that the above trend is generally positive because it offers more personal space to fit individual needs, which is worthy to choose living alone or in a small family rather than in extended family group.
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society. Because of this, all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problemsTo what extend do you agree or disagreeWhat other measures do you think might be effective 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'family'?
Suggestion: family
... First of all, moving out of a large families to lead a solitary life helps to reduce...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...thus, relatives who share the same roof could possibly oppose each other and develop mutual ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. While the young usually enjoy parties and stay up late, the elder prefer tranq...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to live'.
Suggestion: to live
...vidual needs, which is worthy to choose living alone or in a small family rather than ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77930638829 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.139481948 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.416666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296861790618 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990680153873 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906566275156 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200134309118 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946395848699 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.