Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is widely claimed that raising the cost of fuel is the most significant way to tackle traffic congestions and environmental impacts. This essay will agree with the following assertion and discuss what else can be done in order to achieve the same result.
To begin with, if the price of gas will experience an increase, more people will reconsider using their vehicles. As a result, less vehicles will be driven on a daily basis and more people will be encouraged to use public transportation which will reduce the pollution problems that we have in our environment and the car accidents that we see happening every day. Another way of thinking about this matter would be by understanding how people usually behave when they see something that they cannot afford. For example, when a person needs to buy something right away, he would most likely search for a similar item with approximately the same features for less money. Therefore, if the price of fuel will increment, it will become much more reasonable for people to leave their cars behind and find a substitute.
Furthermore, there are many other great solutions that can be implemented. One of the many is lowering the cost of public transportation. This can greatly help as it will become a better and more efficient as well as effective way for people to commute or just get from one point to another. Consequently, resulting in less gas emissions and fewer cars on the streets and most importantly, less casualties. For instance, when a person will find that it is more affordable to travel by bus or a train, he will definitely think about using it as a way to save money.
In conclusion, although increasing traffic and pollution problems become significantly worse for our society, many actions can be taken in order to find a solution.
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ider using their vehicles. As a result, less vehicles will be driven on a daily basi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun casualties is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rs on the streets and most importantly, less casualties. For instance, when a person...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87378640777 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82532612562 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5116831947 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.846153846 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110400808029 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438223357848 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313459225399 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081774674636 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025750339985 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.