Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is argued by some that if we want to curb traffic and contaminant problem we need to raise price of petrol. From my point of view, this is an appreciable measure which impact on other factors like detract of using private vehicles, discard of all faulty transport, however it have legal certificate but create unwanted fumes in the environment.
If price of petrol increases what is ultimately affect on using modes f vehicle. What I mean by this is that because of price, private vehicles consumption cost also reached a peak, therefore, to cope with monthly budget quite difficult for middle-class people. As a result, they are feeling interested to accustome with public transport. Although this changes detrimental impact of personal life but in long-run this is crucial decision for a nation. For example, different multinational organization offer private car for their top level employees, after thriving price, authority is bound to give uniform transport for all.
Apart from this, usage of transportation also impact on the environment. In other words, since people having public vehicle which in turn proportion of gas, emission also fall down, in addition larger percent of people can travel together, hence, reduce traffic, save valuable time, less accident but government also increase their subsidies behind ti get structured public transport. One survey elicit that burgeoning price of petrol specially in developing countries people change their transport preferences, as a result, hefty percent traffic problem solved. In addition emission of carbon mono-oxide also emit from environment.
On the other hand, authority also take preventive measure like organizing awareness programme, rewarding those organization or person who take initiate to use public transport instead of personal transport. Furthermore, enforce law to prohibit using private car and introduce punishment such as 6-12 months jail or similar amount money refund.
In conclusion, i strongly agree that while price of petrol is increasing in return other regardless matters like traffic, pollution also dissolved.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is nit important because life will be easier if their are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- Nowadays,more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face.Is this a positive or negative development. 56
- some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give your ow 89
- More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information Therefore there is no need for printed books magazines and newspapers To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...ard of all faulty transport, however it have legal certificate but create unwanted f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e unwanted fumes in the environment. If price of petrol increases what is ultim...
^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'affected'.
Suggestion: affected
... of petrol increases what is ultimately affect on using modes f vehicle. What I mean b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... of petrol increases what is ultimately affect on using modes f vehicle. What I mean by t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
... this is that because of price, private vehicles consumption cost also reached a peak, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...efty percent traffic problem solved. In addition emission of carbon mono-oxide also emit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'those organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; those organizations
...ganizing awareness programme, rewarding those organization or person who take initiate to use publ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56346749226 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85172764213 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637770897833 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0934232192 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.357142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124515781026 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492066173939 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600830216685 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838131962348 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551554156821 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.