Individual greed and selfishness has been the basis of the modern society. Someone think that we must return to the olds, more traditional values of respect for the family and the local community in order to create a better world to live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People nowadays are criticized as being greedy and self-centered. It is suggested that introducing conventional values of respect in terms of family as well as the local community is the pillar to this phenomenon. I am completely on board with this opinion.
I believe showing our respect to family members and local residents is key to a cohesive society. To specify, due to globalization, nowadays we are inundated with different cultures and backgrounds in one community, and there are great disparities in people’s behaviors and habits even in the same family, which means being ego-centric would easily engender misunderstandings and even trigger conflicts. However, If we can bring back conventional values like respect and try to understand others in our families and communities, there are more chances that those members would feel respected and know we are standing in their shoes, therefore related to us. when a sense of belonging to the family and community is fostered in people, the cohesion of the world would be likely to enhanced.
Some may argue that there is no necessity in respecting families and the local communities, as we are living more independently today. People nowadays tend to live alone and are disconnected with their local communities, so they see no benefit from giving respect to others. However, as the saying goes, no one is an island; people are more or less connected. For example, even though we may not know our neighbours, we would be affected if they are speaking or singing loudly at midnight, which would damage our rest and even work efficiency in the next day. By contrast, we would benefit from a better living environment if everyone is concerned about others in their family or community.
To wrap up, a mutual respect in our family and community is pivotal for a better living environment and a more cohesive world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-07 | helloxjsky | 74 | view |
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think it is a positive or negative development？ 56
- creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas. 78
- The best way for the government to solve traffic congestion is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- the average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now do you agree or disagree 84
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems? What measures can be used to solve these problems? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
... those members would feel respected and know we are standing in their shoes, therefo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ould be likely to enhanced. Some may argue that there is no necessity in respectin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07096774194 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95983518961 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525806451613 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4528042958 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.923076923 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224971589786 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904499959914 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718888873726 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161549732212 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545616832283 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.