Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly believed that governments and the organisations of large scale have more abilities to put measures for environmental problems, and there are lacking capability on individuals. Even though some people believe the former argument, in my opinion, I believe that people can help with several issues related to environments.
On the one hand, there are some people who hold the view that administrations and large industries only can resolve environmental pollution. These people present several arguments, but the most conspicuous one is perhaps that there are amount of monetary subsidies required in order to improve contaminations, as the areas affected by environmental obstructions are extensively huge. Besides, individuals' support is the only effect that banging one's head against a brick wall. Which means, the pollution is already severe as it caused problems all walks of life such as global warming. As a consequence, it is clear that governments and firms can invent financially as the restore process requires an amount of budget; however, individuals cannot afford it since it became a world issue that should be dealt in big administrations such as WHO.
Despite the aforementioned argument, on the other hand, I believe that each person should take a tackle to improve our green natures. There are a plethora of measures can be put in place by individuals, but the most persuasive one is perhaps that people can reduce waste at their households; this is an effective way in which the aforementioned problem can be resolved since burning waste can harm the quality of the atmosphere. As an excellent illustration is that global warming is occurred by the rising temperature of the atmosphere, which can be caused by the incinerator of rubbish. On top of that, people can utilise public transit instead of driving their own cars, this is because the carbon dioxide from the emission would pollute the air, and raining after the air pollution would contaminate the water as well. Lastly, I believe that individuals can plant trees and flowers on their own land which creates oxygen and diminishes carbon dioxides in communities.
In conclusion, although many people believe that individuals have a less impact on improving nature, in my point of view, I highly insist that the public should be involved to solve these issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South Pole.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 80
- Psychologists have known for many years that colour can affect how people feel. For this reason, attention should be given to colour scheme when decorating places such as offices and hospitals.How true is this statement?How far does colour influence peopl 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...nspicuous one is perhaps that there are amount of monetary subsidies required in order...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nts and firms can invent financially as the restore process requires an amount of budget; h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...be dealt in big administrations such as WHO. Despite the aforementioned argument...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, lastly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20789473684 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99701028312 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1420914599 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.230769231 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2307692308 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169362185166 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608857272651 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370136709272 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944334194321 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376802041749 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.