The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People differ greatly in their views about the role of the global community in curtailing the quantity of fossil fuel used in the whole world. From my perspective, I would contend that international collaboration must take urgent actions to guarantee that all countries minimize their usage of fossil fuels.
There are two compelling reasons as to why the international community bears responsibilities for cutting down the consumption of fossil fuels on a global scale. First and foremost, there are problems associated with burning this type of fuel that happens in the whole world such as global warming and climate change. The aforementioned task, as a consequence, cannot be solved by one single country but need the intergovernmental cooperation in the international level. Furthermore, although using environmentally friendly products is an effective way to curb the usage of fossil fuels, third-world countries do not own this renewable energy technology. As a result, industrialized nations should help developing countries produce technology this technology.
The duties for minimizing consumption of the global community are immediate because of some reasons. The primary reason is that if urgent actions are not taken, the problems of global warming will exert devastating on human life. To explain, not only would the rise of sea level sink many coastal cities and islands in the near future but it is also is the main culprit of the flood. Another convincing reason is that many sources of fossil fuels around the world are already on the verge of depletion. If there is any measure implemented, the scarcity of energy will create a negative impact on the development of industry in most countries.
To sum up, the international community play a central role in carrying out the urgent task of curtailing the amount of fossil fuel consumed in the whole world. This is because there are vast environmental problems related to using this energy source which only can be done by the joining efforts of countries or the shortage of non-fossil fuel resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-29 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 56
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that having these people give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about the dangers of committing a crime. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? What are the solutions? 73
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions? 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...ult, industrialized nations should help developing countries produce technology this techn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shortage of non-fossil fuel resources.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, third, as to, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26506024096 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05546420669 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557228915663 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1935496032 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188986013307 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655983321626 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541206127965 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122813373402 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436391592602 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.