International travel is becoming cheaper and cheaper, and more countries are now opening their doors to foreign visitors. Do you think that the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued that it found the travel less and less expensive than in the past, and the governments tend to boost to tourism, especially foreign tourist. I strongly agree that this trend’s advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why the authority should propose the tourism policy by lower cost to attract more international visitors. From the perspective of social-economic growth, the more foreign guesses visit the country, the more improvement living standard for localities in particular and nations in general due to creating more jobs for local people and exchanging international currency among countries. For instance, Iceland, in 2015, the growing rate reach 20% compared to the figure for last year, according to the data of IMF. Moreover, one of the side effects of attracting more tourist is creating an equal environment for the underprivileged able to broaden their horizons throughout learning identical cultures, instead of the wealthy could afford, in the past.
On the other hand, besides of benefits above, it also appears many challenges in this trend. In terms of natural resources, catering the needs of a host of international passengers which requires a high standard of infrastructure that so the huge expanding land is one of the prerequisites for construction. As a result, many animals are on the brink of extinction owing to habitat destruction, if not allocating resource rightly. Furthermore, because of the unawareness of environmental protection releasing an amount of garbages to rivers or vendors, plastic bags, cans, papers, namely, which adverse environmental effects on ozone layer depletion and soil degradation.
In conclusion, although it has both countless pros and cons, I suppose it should be less expensive in international travel. However, the authority should take strict measures reducing a negative impact on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 89 | view |
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- (19/09/2015) Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four differnt attractions in Brighton. 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, in general, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47157190635 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19998210306 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638795986622 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7083197079 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145422799363 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495954087127 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481780002648 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811293392184 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424513986044 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.