The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010
A glance at the charts provided compares the proportion of people working in town A and town B in three different fields between 1960 and 2010.
A particularly interesting fact highlighted by the figure is that despite experiencing a decrease, people in the sale sector was by far highest rather than other fields in town A and town B.
In detail, in 1960, the figure for people working in the sale was the most common in town A and town B, accounting at 41% and 70%, respectively. Meanwhile, the percentage of those in manufacturing was 29% in town A, which was nearly triple than the figure of town B. In terms of the service, accounting for 30% of town A, slightly higher than 20% of town B.
In 2010, instead of a half decrease in both proportion of the sale and service was an exponential increase by 35% of those working in the manufacturing sector in the town A. However, there was a substantial drop to 53% in the figure for sale, followed by a slight decrease by 2% of the service. Opposite the trend is to increase rapidly to 25% of the figure for people working in the manufacturing in the town B
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000, and its proportions according to region. 78
- : Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main resources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think it is positive or negative developement. 89
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old house in the local areas, while other think that people should have freedom to build house of their own styles. discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47549019608 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80718906693 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450980392157 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3827150696 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313248698187 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155850391523 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102699437992 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22118915651 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960873524748 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.