With the development of internet, a whole new and comfortable life happens for everyone. However, it is still controversial whether internet can help us to just stay at home and know the world outside our country.
With internet, you can search for any information you like about foreign countries. It can include culture, people, favorite destinations, food, history, etc. For example, google can give you millions of useful websites when you want to know about a nation. Or when you surf facebook, you can find out about a country through your friend's posts. Internet has turned the world into a flat world, brought us closer together. Therefore, if you don't have much money in your pocket, you can travel the world and understand how native people live in your house, with a computer or a laptop.
However, the option is just suitable for people who have a low salary. Nothing is better than seeing your favorite destinations by your own eyes. Internet can't help you touch or feel the greatness of the scenes. Also, it can't help you talk directly, face-to-face with local people to understand more about them. Traveling is always the best way to get in touch with the world. It is better than looking at the screen and imagining about the world outside. If the quote is true, tourism can't survive.
By and large, despite the rising of modern technology like internet, many people still want to come to foreign countries and contact with local people. The reason is clear, you can't just assorb other cultures by just sitting at home and surfing, you have to go and see it directly. Then, your soul will be opened to the world outside.
- Internet technology means people no longer need to travel to foreign countries to understand how they live Do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 56
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t us closer together. Therefore, if you dont have much money in your pocket, you can...
^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...destinations by your own eyes. Internet cant help you touch or feel the greatness of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...l the greatness of the scenes. Also, it cant help you talk directly, face-to-face wi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...l the greatness of the scenes. Also, it cant help you talk directly, face-to-face wi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... outside. If the quote is true, tourism cant survive. By and large, despite the r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... local people. The reason is clear, you cant just assorb other cultures by just sitt...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, then, therefore, for example, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79577464789 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4528988878 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4917194682 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6666666667 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199497853653 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060870141249 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581436420967 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118315771956 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536259510247 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.