Nowadays, we have been bombarded with an array of news from media whether it is electronic media and social media. The media had made great strides with the help of advance technology. In the techno savvy world, media has glamourised the people living standards. People are clutched into the chains of media which has both pros and cons. Selfcentredness and less socialization are some of the impacts of media which are dispensed below.
To commence with, selfcenterdness is prevailing among masses due to the indulgence in media. Socialization is limited. People are more encouraged for non verbal communication in relative to face to face communication.The upsurge of social media and electronic media has led people to become couch potatoes. The tradition of playing in the public parks and gardens is taken away by social applications like Facebook, Instagram and twitter. Apart from this, sedentary lifestyle is the result of media rich society which eventually leads to worst health conditions and mentally illness. As its is not enough, media has snatched the privacy of celebrities and famous people. Right for freedom for them is considered needless.
On the other side, the daily routine is encountered myriad benefits of media. The print media like newspaper helps people to bound up their knowledge. It is an asset to keep themselves up to date. Moreover, the grocery items, food and clothing are delivered on the doorstep by using the social media applications like swiggy, zomato and flipkart which lessen the burden of housewives. Furthermore, in today's 4g era, media has brought people from native countries come closer. One can have a talk with ones near and dear ones in the friction of seconds. Hence, media has developed as a boon for the masses.
Suffice to say, usage of media is depends upon people. According to my perspective, the merits outweigh the drawbacks. It totally relied on us whether we have to take it as a boon or a bane.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- explain merits and demerits of living in media rich soceity 100
- Nowadays a large amount of advertising aimed at children should be banned because of the negative effects To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe money is a less important factor than free time for quality of life What do you think about it What other factors are necessary to live a good quality of lifestyle 73
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...fcentredness and less socialization are some of the impacts of media which are dispensed be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...or non verbal communication in relative to face to face communication.The upsurge of social med...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... relative to face to face communication.The upsurge of social media and electronic ...
^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the worst'.
Suggestion: to the worst
...dia rich society which eventually leads to worst health conditions and mentally illness....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06153846154 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84247412857 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1283015706 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7727272727 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7727272727 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251810061828 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686906303101 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551153402077 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145712630991 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633194941297 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.