It is believed that people who read a lot of novels have developed better imagination and language skills than people who prefer to watch TV.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Individuals who are engaged in habit of reading such as, novels are believed to have good communication skills and good virtual power than the person's involved in watching television. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement.
Supporters of opposing concept argue that, television acts as the information and relaxation box. As this technology provides us live updates of news around the world along with the pictures and makes easy to understand the impact occurred. Therefore there is less involvement of brain to imagine things. For example, News report about unforeseen conditions like floods or earthquake, reporters nowadays reach to the site and gives us the live information along with filming the place. However, watching television can improve the language skills to some extent but does not provide lasting effect. This box can also have adverse effects on health like stressing the eyesight.
On the other hand, people having the hobby of reading novels makes them greedy for knowledge. Reading activity keeps the human senses and brain active. For example, while reading a scene from novel, the person thinks through the writer's viewpoint and also tries to picture the image of the context. Moreover, reading replenishes our brain by involving in this type of exercise. This activity acts as a catalyst to improve the language skills as well as the imagination power.As we read through the story or the article we come across variety of phrases and idioms, which in turn we can learn and use in our daily communication. This adds grace to our language.
In conclusion, watching television has some benefits, but it is true, advantages of reading creates a greater impact on one's knowledge of language and imagination.
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 82
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings?Should history stand in the way of progress? 89
- The pie chart shows the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- Should college students be forced to take courses outside their main area of study? Why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...easy to understand the impact occurred. Therefore there is less involvement of brain to i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...nt but does not provide lasting effect. This box can also have adverse effects on he...
^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...om novel, the person thinks through the writers viewpoint and also tries to picture the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...skills as well as the imagination power.As we read through the story or the articl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2304964539 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70963988055 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609929078014 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3706166567 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195875897323 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573571816312 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605114550603 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118197592889 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578094088564 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.