It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend?
Nowadays, family members are not as close as they were before. At the same time, however, there is some uncertainty as to the causes of the problem, and how it might be resolved. In this essay, I will examine the issue and seek some possible solutions.
To begin with, in regard to causes, it is undeniable that better job opportunities in big cities lead to the fact that young generation would rather live alone than live with their parents, which alienates the family members from each other. For instance, in many rural areas in China, old people are ill in bed but their children that work in big cities are too far to take care of them. In addition, different education background makes it hard for family members to understand each other as people of different ages may tend to have totally different opinions towards the same thing. To be specific, old people usually hold traditional thinking which is taught when they were young but the young tend to be more open-minded and more vulnerable to novel things.
On the other hand, as to solution, the government should invest abundant fund to improve the job market in the countryside where the economic development is comparatively slow. In this way, the young generations from these areas could land good jobs, living with their parents. Furthermore, the government ought to encourage the schools to introduce more knowledge about old tradition to the students, so that the students could have more common topics with their parents and they can understand each other better.
To summarise, there is no doubt that better working environment in huge cities and different learning background would make people far away from their families. At the same time, however, to address this issue the government should carry out policies to help rural countryside increase job opportunities and encourage schools to open more courses about tradition.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-21 | pqh2612002 | 61 | view |
2018-12-26 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
2018-11-29 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
2018-11-29 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- Some people think that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and the government and big companies can make a difference. To what extent you agree or disagree? 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Living in a big city can be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to, for instance, in addition, no doubt, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04430379747 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61325733981 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54746835443 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9122131005 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123383036419 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520086129464 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460182687389 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868690264685 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745131522192 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.