It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Teaching children how to distinguish right and wrong at an early age is significant. Punishment can also be given to carry out the theory. However, that must be a constructive punishment which helps build them up instead of putting them in negative attitude.
Children are totally new papers. they will become what we "draw" on them. Therefore, knowing right and wrong at an early age has an intense influence on young children. they have chances to be exposed to what are considered right and wrong definitions, and because this is done when they are little, habits and a solid ground will be formed as time passes by. For examples, if we show them taking someone's objects without permission is bad and thus receiving a bad outcome, they at least have a general picture in their head that this is not something they should do the next time.
So the question emerges, what method or technique should we use to teach them? Does punishment work out in this case? Punishment can be more of a negative effect than a beneficial one, especially if we abuse of it and do not have an appropriate type of punishment. We all understand the bad feelings when being punished. Being exposed to this type of emotions for a long time can make children weak, easily to get afraid, and tend to be over-obeyed with no reasons. Bullied at school, trying to please everyone or always being in the anxious condition are the most likely to happen outcomes.
All the thing we need to consider about punishment is that it is not a tool to scare children away or to make them anxious, it is a supportive way for them to experience the result and understand why certain things are wrong and right. Therefore, it is nothing but a constructive punishment will work out. this type can include two possible steps: first is to show them how does it feels if that happens to them and second is to give punishments as light as possible. For instance, if they take someone's toys without asking, we can create a similar situation but at this time they are the one whose toys are gone and ask them whether they feel bad about this. If their answer is yes, tell them that what they are suffering is exactly what people are suffering when this happens as well. After that, an agreement that we won't buy any new toy in the next few days can be made as an attached condition.
Teaching children at an early age how to distinguish what are right and wrong is undoubtedly a thing that parents should take into consideration, as it can form habits and build a solid ground for them when they grow up. However, a harsh punishment won't work out in this case cause it has more negative effects than positive ones. It is a constructive and light punishment focusing on how would they feel if they suffer from that bad situation and why this happens that will work out.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 84
- The graph below shows a satisfaction rating of the staff in four colleges from 1991 to 2002 85
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 79
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a universitylibrary to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...de. Children are totally new papers. they will become what we 'draw' on...
^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...an intense influence on young children. they have chances to be exposed to what are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ges, what method or technique should we use to teach them? Does punishment work out...
^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... constructive punishment will work out. this type can include two possible steps: fi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'feel'?
Suggestion: feel
...teps: first is to show them how does it feels if that happens to them and second is t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'feel'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: feel
...teps: first is to show them how does it feels if that happens to them and second is t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 13.1623246493 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 62.0 24.0651302605 258% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 508.0 315.596192385 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60236220472 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57819613183 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458661417323 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6974096451 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.652173913 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0869565217 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 3.9879759519 426% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303662295731 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100252722936 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563346571561 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2041235608 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245912572384 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.