It is more important to have a good family than to have friends. Family can always compensate for absence of friendship.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since ancient times the concept of family and friendship has been always crucial in people’s lives. Proceeding from this, an opinion exists that relatives is much more significant than acquaintances and completely replaces comrades. Although I believe that buddies must not be neglected the importance of the loved ones cannot be underestimated.
On the one hand, unless person has a strong family, going through life’s challenges can be complicated. Members may give advice, share experience, help in any complicated situation and support in an arduous moment. A family is a small world where a certain atmosphere reigns and where everyone knows very well the habits and character of others. For example, my loved ones have always supported me through the ups and downs, the scary and beautiful moments, walked with me across everything, and continue to do so. Thus, having a close-knit relatives may bring numerous benefits and provide support in various aspects of life.
On the other hand, that having individuals from the same level should not be disregarded or undervalued. Peers helps to grow up individual in terms of their personal and social development, allows to cultivate certain personality traits. The character of an adult is formed precisely by reason of the society that surrounds them and changes throughout life. In 18 years, I have acquired many habits (sometimes unknowingly) from people I know, learned a lot, and will continue to do so, becoming a better person. Hence, the presence of comrades in life develops a person, helps to discover them as a person and to socialize in society.
Taking everything into consideration, it can be concluded that strong family bonds offer support and stability, while friends enhance personal growth and socialization. Therefore, I believe that both family and friends are valuable in their own ways and essential for a fulfilling and balanced life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 67 | view |
- In some cultures children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 84
- There is no need to maintain a close relationship with distant relatives Do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- There is no need to maintain a close relationship with distant relatives Do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnical co 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ances and completely replaces comrades. Although I believe that buddies must not be negl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cultivating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: cultivating
...personal and social development, allows to cultivate certain personality traits. The charact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28104575163 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89698094775 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637254901961 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.8923165037 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189607889464 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558803877513 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457403361076 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113662491826 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037326309995 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.