It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, it is so sad to say that there are many animal species extinct because of many affections of people or natural disasters. While some people believe that we don’t have any reason to protect animal’s life, it is my firm belief that we should try to prevent animals endangered.
First and foremost, animals seem to be the primary source of food for human life. In Vietnam, for instance, a large amount of pork is consumed to make food per day. Besides that, there are more and more types of animals that are used to provide food for people every day. Therefore, it seems sensible that protecting the animals’ life can ensure the essential ingredients for us to live.
In addition, numerously different animal species are playing some important roles in becoming a part of the ecosystem. For example, in the forest of Australia, there are so many kinds of animals living with trees, flowers, etc., that help balance the ecosystem. Thus, saving animal species which have the ability to extinct will make our life more diverse and not become unbalanced.
In summary, preventing animals which are endangered is extremely important to human life because they are playing some essential roles in providing ingredients and balancing the ecosystem. If they are extinct, we will be threatened because of the lack of a significant part of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-10 | baoquyen1906 | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92640692641 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58223566035 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549783549784 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8429774211 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227600841265 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873054757929 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048309358696 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140089010138 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705435385122 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.