It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel
to the remote natural environments, such as the South Pole.
Do you agree or disagree with this development?
In recent years, it is facilitated for not only scientists but also travelers to approach remote natural environments such as the South Pole. Although many people consider this is totally a positive trend, I totally disagree with this development
On the one hand, it is concreted that this development would bring some dominant benefits. Firstly, it would be financial profits for the primary advantages. For a significant example, many Asian countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, have the tourism industry as the main percentage in their whole GDP annually. Moreover, the way that both foreign researchers, tourists, and domain travelers are able to access far-reaching areas would create a scope to broaden the local culture and education. The poverty ethnic in remote areas in Vietnam ultimately have their opportunities to have a profound transformation in both the economic and educational fields which believed attributed by travelers.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that this development is fraught with pitfalls because it is unsustainable promotion. The first outstanding reason is the disastrous pollution that travelers bring to the local surrounding environment. For example, Everest's management has to reckon with an alarming increase of garbage that travelers and scientists throw out annually. The remote natural environment has been gradually changed by the people who come here in such an immensely positive way such as raising the criminal circumstance. Besides, some local citizens manipulate the foreign travelers and scientists either to commit some illegal activities such as illegal trades, transfer banned products... For instance, on the border of Vietnam and China, there are numerous illegal trades on a daily basis.
In conclusion, after all the concrete arguments I have shown above, this development has downsides that outweigh the advantages. Governments should have a solution for this unsustainable development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-24 | vungochuyen25 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-24 | Nhungmeow246 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environments such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63050847458 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05662353405 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3707941513 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323622659994 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998524926627 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866934641527 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208432581008 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127261087414 0.056905535591 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.