It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the south pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Over the past few decades, it has become possible to travel to far isolated areas in nature like visiting the south pole for tourist and scientists. Advantages of this advancement are comparatively more as compared to the disadvantages.
To embark upon, there are various advantages of travelling to remote environment which are natural. Today it is possible to travel to new excursion. By discovering far places, people get the opportunities to gain worthy experience and come to know variety aspects like temperature, values, animals and many more while environmental scientist could access information conducting their studies. For example, they can enhance their knowledge about polar animal and their life style or ice layer melted these days which make global warming throughout the world even in the South and north poles.
On the other hand, one of the drawbacks of coming to natural environment far away our home is that the habitat of flora and fauna is in danger of human’ curiosity. Therefore, not only does travelling to untouched area impact on animals’ health and their behaviours but also travellers might face the risk if being attacked by animals like white bears. Also visiting somewhere such as the Amazon rainforest require a large amount of investment which is high. As a result, it seems that rich people and environmental researchers can afford these expeditions and ordinary people can not enjoy these areas unfortunately.
By the way if conclusion, although having a visit remote regions have disadvantages, it can be argued that the demerits are outweighed by merits of experiencing undiscovered places mentioned in this world in order to broaden our horizons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Saeedeamani | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | mayankmm | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | dqhungdl | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | dqhungdl | 67 | view |
- Leaders and directors in an organization normally oler people.some people think younger leader would be better.do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that too much attention and too much many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 67
- The educational standards have declined in recent times particularly in the area of literacy and numeracy. Discuss the cause of this problem and odder some possible solution to it. 89
- The educational standards have declined in recent times particularly in the area of literacy and numeracy. Discuss the cause of this problem and odder some possible solution to it. 89
- The educational standards have declined in recent times particularly in the area of literacy and numeracy. Discuss the cause of this problem and odder some possible solution to it. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...this advancement are comparatively more as compared to the disadvantages. To emb...
^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s; health but also travellers might face the risk if being attacked by animals. A...
^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... the risk if being attacked by animals. Also visiting somewhere such as the Amazon r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fford these expeditions. To conclution , although visiting remote regions have d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40174672489 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09315055247 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.694323144105 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7303128342 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.454545455 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231813769573 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767198882286 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04832275758 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125139847266 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509080587484 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.