It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development
Nowadays, venturing to faraway natural areas have been a growing trend, each with their own purposes and interests. Although, this development of tourism comes with great concern to the environmental activists, but scientists should still be encouraged to study and explore these land.
Scientists with different specialty need to vistit remote natural environment like the South Pole in order to discover new things and study about it. First, on-site research give the scientists the advantage and opportunity to gather new material and information, which was give by mother nature, for analysing. This will provide not only the knowledge which the scientists needed in order to find new solutions for research problem but also the society as a whole since the scientists will creat new invention to protect the environment and others human problems.Second, scientists travel to remote natural environment in attemp to collect sample that provide about how the earth was formed and learn how to protect human from future natural disaster. In fact, If we knew the formation of the earth in the past, we can predict the future of the earth and what is happening to it, such as earthquake, vocanol eruption.
There are many reasons for tourists to travel to isolated natural environment. One of those is to experience the unforgettable one of a kind feeling when going on an adventure to the remoted areas. In other words, those who visit the South Pole will have an impact on their life, they will see and do things they have never done before, such as viewing the polar lights and immerse in the scenery. Furthermore, by living in the environment like this, tourist will appreciate more the nature and what they have at home. In fact, they will become more aware of themself and what the human have done to mother nature so as to protect the beauty of nature, even raise the public awareness by becoming an activist.
In conclusion, travelling to remote natural environtment benefits many ways which is good for mankinds, as long as we do not cause any damage to our mother earth and the ecology system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-21 | Michael Khoa Thái | 56 | view |
- the table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important profeffsions. some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair 36
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...a whole since the scientists will creat new invention to protect the environment and others h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 564, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Second
...e environment and others human problems.Second, scientists travel to remote natural en...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...at the human have done to mother nature so as to protect the beauty of nature, even rais...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, as for, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97450424929 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67407091335 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538243626062 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.2768185463 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.333333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4166666667 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2893888546 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105526820231 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710354626661 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161043358401 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179677331093 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.