Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
In recent years, Global warming has been considered one of the top problems around the globe, causing public controversy and receiving media attention due to its substantial impacts on our daily life. Although the link between humans and cliamte change seem to be clear, but this does not mean that coexisting with it is a way to battle against global warming.
There are a number of reasons why coexisting with climate change can do more harm than good. Frist, a part from nature, humans activity are the main reason why there is climate change. For example, many developing countries use fossil fuels like coal, gas and oil, in order to produce energy for the economy, which directly contribute to the climate change issue. Second, if mankind keeps living in the downgrading enviroment like this, not only it will have an impact on our daily lives but also the future generation, especially health problems. Therefore, since humans were responsible for the climate change, living with it will eventually lead to futher catastrophe.
On the other hand, it sound more logical to prevent global warming than to coexist with it. In fact, the reason behind it is the cost of dealing with future consequences of global warming can be enormous. As a result, if this costs can be waived, it will greatly reduce the loss of time and money caused by the global warming effects such as storm and drought or others natural disasters. Furthermore, the changes in temperature will not only affect the humankind but also orthers species, causing worldwide extinction, which is irreversible. In other words, ecological imbalance is the price can not be paid.
In conclusion, prevention is better than cure so actively fighting against global warming should be our top priority. Climate change is a global matter that can not be done by one man, we need all the help we can get.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-11 | Michael Khoa Thái | 89 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 89
- successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important profeffsions. some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair 36
- the table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sounds'?
Suggestion: sounds
...her catastrophe. On the other hand, it sound more logical to prevent global warming ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56244560684 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5975004155 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142817889179 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531587529039 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441683890093 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845401375458 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378931739238 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.