It is observed that in many countries, not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be effected on society?
The preference for learning science subjects by aspirants in many a nation seems to be very low. Perhaps, it is the dwindling job opportunities and explored possibilities of art subjects which might be causing this. Society appears to accumulate with art professionals, and there would be a shortage of science experts among people.
There are mainly two reasons behind the trend of students not opting for science streams. Firstly, career opportunities in the field of science appear to diminish over these years because of the growing demand for economics and banking sector jobs. For example, a scientist draws a lesser salary than a bank executive these days. Secondly, it is observed that during the last decade, professions in the field of art subjects have reached new heights. With the freedom and work culture, this stream has won the hearts of many students. Product design, advertising, and literature have proved to be offering a lucrative career to youngsters today.
Trendsetters definitely affect society. People are likely to start more institutions for art subjects whereas courses offering science by colleges appear to go down. This eventually would supply umpteen art professionals to the community, and the dearth of science professionals would be on the discourse then. In India, students going for bank exam coaching has shown a sharp rise over the last decade by a survey conducted by the National Council of Education and Research.
In conclusion, the shift of interest of students from science to arts is purely born out of the change of job demands and work nature. Society would be facing an indefinite proportion of science and art professions in the coming days.
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 70
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 89
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree agree 73
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 61
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21167883212 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83890938005 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3723161756 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189489076117 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644333849602 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436424670001 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126047937851 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483962596549 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.