It is often argued that some people are constant at their employment places while others prefer to challenge themselves in various companies.
It is often argued that some people are constant at their employment places while others prefer to challenge themselves in various companies. To my mind, working for the same organisation might be a great chance for promotion, however, I believe that changing working place would lead to have a number of experiences.
Firstly, it is an indisputable fact that some employees prefer to be stable at they company and I think this is because of growth in status, a sense of loyalty or high salary. It means that some workers work for promotion, waiting their status to be increased, in their working life time and it could be symbolised as a sense of being loyal towards to the company. The other reason for staying at the same office could be a greater salary therefore some employees might choose not to change their employment position even they do not have a job satisfaction.
However, for some people, working for different organizations would be better as they want to challenge themselves and undergo a wide range of experiences, I suppose. For instance, if people work in a number of companies, they might have an opportunity to learn and compare the conditions and facilities of company with their previous working places. Additionally, they might make new colleague and learn teamwork in different condition
In conclusion, I think that people choose to hold their employment at the same company since a chance is provided to be promoted yet, I feel changing work places could lead people to test themselves and undergo a number of experiences in different positions.
- Do you agree or disagree that women can work in governmental works 56
- Similarities among nations are now common as citizens have equal opportunities such as worldwide consumptions To my mind even though purchasing all types of products from every part of the world brings about negative effects including loss of cultures and 56
- The two bar charts illustrate the statistics about types of activities excluding full time jobs that British final year students had after their graduations in 2008
- The two pie charts illustrate the developments in the production of different types of grains in NWFP which have happened from 1990 to 2020
- The line graph illustrates the number of visitors came to a particular island of Caribbean from 2010 to 2017 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...tatus to be increased, in their working life time and it could be symbolised as a sense o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... test themselves and undergo a number of experiences in different positions.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, i suppose, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00378787879 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85411828094 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3220816813 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.125 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342817381163 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200340581812 0.084324248473 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.262080742346 0.0667982634062 392% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237784077605 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138851029662 0.056905535591 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.